New Degree Major Programs


Important Notice

  1. We are currently implementing Curriculog, a paperless curriculum management, for all curriculum proposals. 

  2. We have a planned Go-Live-Date in August 2018. 

  3. We encourage everyone to wait to submit proposals for the 2019/20 Academic Year until we go live with Curriculog. 

For questions, please call x3332 or email Sarah Schraeder.


Types of New Degree Program Proposals


Department chairs who plan to submit proposals for new degree major programs are asked to meet with the Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs one-year prior to the planned date for submitting the proposal to the campus review processes (two years prior to the anticipated implementation date).

There are three versions of proposals to submit new degree programs to the Chancellor's Office:


Traditional Track


For normal new degree program proposals, the following process applies: 

  1. One-page proposal requesting addition to the Academic Master Plan for the Board of Trustee Review.
    Due the 1st Friday in December each fall.
  2. Full proposal submission to the Office of the Chancellor after full campus approval.
    If no major issues raised during review, this is normally due at least six month before implementation.

For More Info

 

Pilot Track


A limited number of proposals that meet the fast track criteria may be implemented as 5-year "pilot programs" without prior review and comment by the Chancellor.

A notification to Chancellor's Office of plans to establish the program, including a program description, list of curricular requirements, and confirmation that each of the six criteria apply, is required. 

While Chancellor’s Office approval is not required, a pilot-program must be acknowledged by the Chancellor’s Office before the program is implemented.

For More Info 

Fast Track 


The fast-track process shortens the time to implementation by allowing proposals to be submitted at the same time that the projection is proposed to the Trustees. Fast track proposals still undergo system-level review, and the fast track does not move the proposal through an expedited review process. 

Fast track proposals that meet the criteria that are submitted to the Chancellor's Office, which which raise no major issues can be acted on by the Board of Trustees, if submitted on 

  1. 1st Monday in January
    • Potential for full approval in July
  2. 2nd Monday in June
    • Potential for full approval in Decembe

For More Info


Notification of WASC

After campus and Chancellor's Office approvals of new degree program proposals, the Office of Academic Programs will submit the new degree program to Stanislaus State's accrediting body, WASC Senior College and University's (WSCUC) through their “screening form”.  Their review will ensure that the program does not represent a significant departure from the institution’s offerings since the last reaffirmation of accreditation visit. If the program does this, a Substantive Change Review will be required. 


Traditional Track


The traditional track involves a two-part program planning and implementation process.

  1. First, an updated academic plan is submitted from the campus to the Chancellor’s Office. This academic plan contains projections of new degree programs to be established in the next five years. New projections are reviewed by Chancellor’s Office staff and, when campus and Chancellor’s Office staff agree, the updated plan is submitted to the Board of Trustees for its approval in March of each year. Trustee approval allows the campus to incorporate projected programs in their capital outlay planning.
    Submit a brief proposal to request the addition of a projected degree program to the Stanislaus State Academic Master Plan to the Office of Academic Programs no later than the first Friday in December.
    • The draft plan is a very brief narrative response (one to two pages) that is prepared by the department proposing the new degree program. Note that new bachelor’s degrees should be as enduring as possible in content and title. Breadth is the hallmark of bachelor’s degrees, and more narrow specialization occurs at the graduate level. Summaries should address concisely the following elements, which are the criteria by which proposed changes to the CSU Academic Master Plan are evaluated:
    1. Degree designation and title (e.g., BS Biochemistry);
    2. Projected implementation date;
    3. Delivery mode: fully face-to-face, hybrid, or fully online program;
    4. A brief summary of the purpose and characteristics of the proposed degree program;
    5. Support mode: state-support or self-support/extended education;
    6. Anticipated student demand;
    7. Workforce demands and employment opportunities for graduates;
    8. Other relevant societal needs;
    9. An assessment of the required resources and a campus commitment to allocating those resources; and
    10. As applicable:
      1. If the projection is a pilot program, please list the academic years during which the program will operate in pilot status.
      2. For new degree programs that are not already offered in the CSU, please provide a compelling rationale explaining how the proposed subject area constitutes a coherent, integrated degree program that has potential value to students and meets CSU requirements for an academic program at the undergraduate or graduate level.
         
    • The brief narrative must have the signature approval of the Department Curriculum Committee, the Department Chair, the College Curriculum Committee, and the College Dean prior to submitting it to the Office of Academic Programs for final signature approval from the AVP for Academic Planning and Analysis. If there is a possibility of the proposed program impinging upon, overlapping with, or being of significant interest to another discipline, consultation between the disciplines must occur prior to submitting the narrative. The consultation results may be attached to the narrative. 
       
    • Academic Master Plan New Degree Program Template.docx
    • Academic Master Plan Signature Page.docx
  2. Second, following Trustee approval of the plan, detailed proposals for implementation of projected programs are then submitted to the Chancellor for approval. Programs that involve degrees in areas new to the CSU as well as most programs that would involve separate specialized accreditation benefit from this two-step traditional review process.

Traditional Track Timelines

  • Sample Timeline for January Submission
    January Timeline.pdf (for Fall 2017 Implementation)
  • Sample Timeline for June Submission
    June Timeline.pdf (for Spring 2017 or Fall 2017 Implementation)

Back To Top


Fast Track Programs


Fast-Track: Combined Projection and Proposal

In the traditional proposal process, a campus must submit for Trustee approval a proposed degree projection on the campus academic plan; and subsequent to Trustee approval of the projection, the campus may begin developing a degree proposal that will be submitted to the Chancellor’s Office for system-level review and approval. In the traditional process, proposals are to be submitted in the academic year preceding planned implementation.

As adopted by the Board in July 1997, the fast-track process shortens the time to implementation by allowing proposals to be submitted at the same time that the projection is proposed to the Trustees. Fast-track proposals still undergo system-level review, and the fast track does not move the proposal through an expedited review process.

Fast-Track Criteria

To be proposed via fast-track, a degree program must meet all of the following six criteria:

  1. The proposed program could be offered at a high level of quality by the campus within the campus’s existing resource base, or there is a demonstrated capacity to fund the program on a self-support basis.
  2. The proposed program is not subject to specialized accreditation by an agency that is a member of the Association of Specialized and Professional Accreditors, or it is currently offered as an option or concentration that is already recognized and accredited by an appropriate specialized accrediting agency.
  3. The proposed program can be adequately housed without a major capital outlay project. Major capital outlay construction projects are those projects whose total cost is $610,000 or more (as adjusted pursuant to Cal. Pub. Cont. Code §§ 10705(a); 10105 and 10108).
  4. It is consistent with all existing state and federal law and Trustee policy.
  5. It is either a bachelor’s or master’s degree program.
  6. The proposed program has been subject to a thorough campus review and approval process.

Fast-Track Timeline

Two deadlines:

  • The first Monday in January—for July approval
  • The second Monday in June—for December approval

IF the proposals raise no major issues, it can be acted on by the Board of Trustees.

Proposals Template 

When submitting an update to the campus academic plan, please note any fast-track degree proposals and include a very brief description of the program and a rationale for offering it through the fast-track process.

Back To Top


Pilot Track Programs


Pilot-Program Criteria

Pilot degree programs must meet all of the following six criteria:

  1. The proposed program could be offered at a high level of quality by the campus either within the campus’s existing resource base, or there is a demonstrated capacity and support to fund the program on a self-support basis.
  2. The proposed program is not subject to specialized accreditation by an agency that is a member of the Association of Specialized and Professional Accreditors, or it is currently offered as an option or concentration that is already recognized and accredited by an appropriate specialized accrediting agency.
  3. The proposed program can be adequately housed without a major capital outlay project. Major capital outlay construction projects are those projects whose total cost is $610,000 or more (as adjusted pursuant to Cal. Pub. Cont. Code § 10705(a); 10105 and 10108).
  4. It is consistent with all existing state and federal law and Trustee policy.
  5. It is either a bachelor’s or master’s degree program.
  6. The proposed program has been subject to a thorough campus review and approval process.
  7. If a self-support program, a budget must be included showing: 1) the per-unit cost to students, 2) the total cost to complete the program, and 3) a cost recovery budget. (See Pilot Program Proposal Template for required budget elements).

Pilot Program Implementation Procedures

  1. Prior to implementation, the campus is obligated to (1) notify the Chancellor’s Office of plans to establish the program, (2) to provide a program description and list of curricular requirements, and (3) to confirm that each of the six pilot criteria apply to the pilot program. To facilitate this requirement, campuses may use the Pilot Program Proposal Template found on the APP website at www.calstate.edu/APP/Resources.
  2. While Chancellor’s Office approval is not required, a pilot-program must be acknowledged by the Chancellor’s Office before the program is implemented.
  3. A campus may implement a pilot program without first proposing the projection on the campus Academic Plan.  In such cases, the program will be identified as a pilot program in the next annual update of the campus Academic Plan.

Pilot Operational Policy

  1. A pilot program is authorized to operate only for five years.
  2. If no further action is taken by the end of the five years, no new students can be admitted to the pilot program.
  3. If no further action is taken by the end of the five years, the campus is obliged to make appropriate arrangements for students already enrolled to complete the program.
  4. After five years, if a campus decides to convert the pilot program to regular program status, the campus is required to follow the procedure outlined in the Converting Pilot Programs to Regular Program Status policy, found at www.calstate.edu/APP/Resources

Proposal Template

Back To Top


Useful Resources


The following additional documents will assist faculty and administration in developing new degree programs:

  1. Policies and Procedures for New Degree Programs
  2. New Degree Program Proposal Supporting Documentation
  3. Accreditation of New Programs
  4. Degree Designation 
  5. Assessment Plan

Back To Top