PADM 5006 Exam 1 Fall 2006
Use separate sheets of paper as needed to answer. Please be sure to put your name on your
answer sheets, the part of the exam you are answering, and the number of the
question you are answering. When done
staple all your answer sheets and your exam together and hand them in.
Part I (60
points): Please briefly explain your responses.
1. In
a recent email discussion linked to the Modesto Bee’s Hive concerns over the
rise in the cost of housing in the
2. Do
you consider local police services a public good (or near public good)? Why or why not?
3. What
are some of the major criticisms of the definition of the poverty line used in
the
4. Recent studies have found numerous health benefits
to almonds. Almonds are high in protein,
vitamin E, magnesium, fiber, potassium, calcium, phosphorus and iron. They help satisfy hunger and may reduce “bad
cholesterol”, lower the probability of heart disease, stroke, and other chronic
diseases. The majority of the world’s almond supplies are grown here in the
valley. Do almonds provide significant
enough positive externalities that we should provide substantial subsidies for
buying almonds?
5. Some community services are understaffed. A suggestion is made to require all citizens
to contribute 10 hours per month of their time to providing community
services. It is argued this will make it
possible to undertake many more community projects and reduce taxpayer costs
since the labor will be essentially “free”. You are evaluating this
proposal, in conducting your study how would you evaluate the costs of the
labor? In your answer please also comment on the difference between
“on-budget costs” and social costs.
6. What’s the difference between a social insurance
program and an income redistribution program? Please give an example of each
and explain how the justifications differ.
Part II (40
points): Please explain your responses fully and show your work.
1. Around
this time of year many people enjoy lighting a fire in the fireplace and
gathering the family around to celebrate the holidays. According to an article in the Modesto Bee
“Tiny flecks of soot and ash from wood fires add to the region's chronic
particle pollution. Medical researchers
have linked particle pollution to lung disease, heart problems and premature
death.” (Modesto Bee 11/1/06, http://www.modbee.com/local/story/12960783p-13614107c.html). Why might it be desirable for the government
to be involved in this issue? (Hint: please relate this issue to the Coase Theorem.) How could public policy be used? What are
some of the advantages and disadvantages of alternative approaches?
2. The city you work for is
considering installing a pond with a fountain that will add beauty to the
community and also reduce the probability of flood waters getting into local
residences and businesses. The pond with
fountain will cost $10 million to install and $10,000 a year for
maintenance. Fortunately, with proper
maintenance the pond and fountain are expected to last forever. For each of the 1,000 large businesses in the
area the expected value of the flood reductions will be approximately $25 per
year. About 100,000 residents will each
benefit from the beauty and reduced likelihood of flooding by approximately $10
each per year. The interest rate is 10%.
A)
What is the
approximate present value of the project’s costs? What is the approximate
present value of the project’s benefits? What is the approximate net present
value of the project based on the data you have? Is the project admissible?
B)
Suppose the
maintenance cost estimates and benefit estimates were in current dollars and
the interest rate of 10% was in nominal terms.
Your analysis suggests expected inflation is 6%. How would your estimates of the approximate
present value of the project’s costs, benefits, and net present value change?
C)
If the pond and
fountain would only last for three years even with the maintenance, what would
be the approximate present value of the project’s costs?
D)
There is another
project that would provide a net benefit of $20 each to a different group of
200,000 people immediately, but is unlikely to be provided in the absence of
government intervention. Unfortunately,
due to insufficient budget and political will you can only do one of the
projects. Comparing the project
described in “A)” and this project, in the absence of any other information
about the people involved, which project should be preferred and why?
E)
What
"distributional weight" would make you indifferent between the
original project in part “A)” and this new project?