California State University, Stanislaus

Master of Social Work Program

 

Capstone Course

SW 5991

 

Units:  2 (taken for two consecutive semesters)

Instructor: John A. García, Ph.D.

Office: Professional Schools Building, DBH-148

Telephone: 667-3769

e-mail: jgarcia@toto.csustan.edu

 

Course Description

 

This “two-semester” course is designed as a continuation of the research sequence and is intended to contribute to the successful completion of the Master’s Thesis or Graduate Project.  In this advanced level course, students draw on the foundational knowledge that was established in the Social Work Research Methods and Data Analysis courses to conceptualize, fully implement, and disseminate a research study or project that contributes to the social work knowledge base. 

 

            This course is designed with the intention to add both depth and structure to students’ capstone work, while expanding their research knowledge and skills.  Specifically, this course serves as a mechanism for providing more attention to research issues that were introduced in the foundation research sequence but require greater discussion, examination, and synthesis, such as issues pertaining to problem formulation, human subjects, research design, measurement, analysis, and dissemination.  

In the first semester of this class, attention is devoted to the conceptualization of research and methodological issues, and students are challenged to grapple with decisions related to methodological rigor and feasibility issues.  In the second semester, the focus of the class is on analysis and dissemination issues, and students are challenged to explore and develop strategies for drawing conclusions and presenting findings.  While the course is designed to add to students’ depth of understanding and research skills, the course also serves as a vehicle for keeping students on track to complete their theses/projects in a timely fashion.  Additionally, this course is designed to offer both support and insight to help develop students’ writing skills related to research manuscripts.    

 

As knowledge building is a responsibility of social work practitioners, this course will help solidify students’ understanding and participation in research and will further prepare them to assume leadership roles in developing and expanding knowledge.  Furthermore, this course will ensure that the capstone products that are completed are consistent with standards of excellence expected at the graduate level and within the social work profession. 

 

Social Work 5020 (Social Work Research Methods) and Social Work 5050 (Data Analysis) are prerequisites to enrollment in this capstone course; they provide students with the foundational knowledge for the successful completion of this advanced course.  Students must enroll concurrently in Social Work 5990 (Thesis Advising) and 5991 (Capstone Course).

 

Learning Objectives

 

A student who successfully completes this course will:

 

1. Possess the skills to contribute to the knowledge base of the social work profession by completing an independent and substantive capstone endeavor.

 

2. Expand her/his research skills that will continue to enhance social work practice.

 

3. Be knowledgeable of and sensitive to cultural and ethical implications of social work research.

 

4. Apply knowledge from course work and practicum to a research study.

 

5. Demonstrate the ability to conceptualize practice as evolving and needing continual development.

 

 

Course Requirements

 

Prerequisites

 

Satisfactory completion of SW 5020 (Research Methods) and SW 5050 (Data Analysis) is required prior to enrollment in SW 5991. 

 

Thesis Chair (Independent Study Work)

 

This class does not reduce the need for or the importance of the Thesis/Project Chair.  Each student is required to enroll in SW 5990 and meet with his/her assigned thesis Chair outside of this class.  Meeting times should be scheduled between the student and the Chair.  In order to promote collaboration, clarity and understanding, each student is strongly encouraged to share both written and verbal feedback that is provided in the capstone course with her/his Thesis Chair.   

 

Textbooks

 

Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2001). Research Methods for Social Work (4th ed.), Belmont, CA:

Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

 

Weinbach, R. W., & Grinnell, R. M. (2001).  Statistics for Social Workers (5th ed.).  Allyn and Bacon:

Boston.

 

See Attached Bibliography.

 

Grading

 

Course grades will be calculated using a +/- grading system.  The following grading scale will be utilized: A (93% and above), A- (90% to 92%), B+ (87% to 89%), B (83% to 86%), B- (80% to 82%), C+ (77% to 79%), C (73% to 76%), C- (70% to 72%), D+ (67% to 69%), D (63% to 66%), D- (60% to 62%), F (Below 60%).   

 

The course grade will be based on two components: 1) the quality of the written product(s) and 2) the adherence to timelines. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignments

 

First Semester

 

In order to keep students on the target timelines and allow the instructor (and Chair) to provide feedback, students will submit drafts of their work at strategically designated times throughout the semester.  (Students are strongly encouraged to submit work prior to the assigned “deadline.”)  The following weight will be given to written material:

 

 

Draft of Introduction (chapter 1):           5% of semester grade

Draft of Methodology (chapter 3):         5% of semester grade

Thesis/Project Proposal:                       60% of semester grade

Reading List:                                         30% of semester grade

 

 

1) Thesis/Project Proposal:  This assignment requires students to complete Chapters 1 and 3 of their thesis/project.  The elements of these chapters are outlined below:

 

Chapter I, Introduction to the Study/Project, including:

 

1) A Statement of the Problem or Issue underpinning the work.

 

2) The Statement of Purpose (including the research questions) and the Significance of the Study/Project, including the potential use of the results in terms of benefits to individual participants, to the population from which subjects are drawn, to the profession, or to society in general. 

 

3) A description of how the study will address cross-cultural issues, ethnic minority populations, oppressed groups, or populations at risk.

 

4) If applicable, the theoretical basis of the study; a description of the underlying theory upon which the study is constructed. 

 

5) Definition of terms.

 

 

Chapter III,      Methodology

 

1) The identification and description of the research design.

 

2) The Sampling Plan: a description of who is to be included in the study, the sampling frame/strategy, and the targeted number of participants.

 

3) Instruments:  a description of the instruments that will be used, how the tool was developed, and how it was tested for reliability and validity.

 

4) Data collection: a description of the location of study, how data will be obtained, how the research will be carried out, a list of the research steps with a timetable.

 

5) Data Analysis: a description regarding how the data will be analyzed--the statistical tests/procedures or the qualitative analysis procedures that will be used to draw findings. 

 

6) Protection of human subjects: a detailed discussion of potential issues involving the subject population-- procedures for protecting participants’ identities and avoiding any harm to subjects.

 

2) A Reading List

 

            Each student is required to compile a list of sources that have been used to shape the research proposal and that will potentially be included in the literature review.  Students are required to submit this reading list in accordance with A.P.A. citation format.

 

 

Second Semester

 

 

Draft of Literature Review:        5% of semester grade

Draft of Results:                        5% of semester grade

Draft of Discussion:                5% of semester grade

Draft of Chapter IV:                 35% of semester grade

Draft of Chapter V:                   35% of semester grade

Presentation of Findings:        15% of semester grade

 

 

1) Chapter II, Literature review

 

            The literature review provides the background for the study.  The review should help set a context for the study by: 1) describing what is known about the problem underpinning the study; 2) identifying the theories that have been used to address/ explain the phenomenon; 3) demonstrating the research strategies that have been used to study the issues; 4) highlighting the major research studies (and authors) that/who have shaped the knowledge base; 5) documenting the strengths and weaknesses of the existing knowledge base.

 

2) Chapter IV, The Results

 

This chapter will present the findings/results and the analytic approach that was used to produce the findings. 

 

3) Chapter V, Discussion

 

This concluding chapter will summarize the capstone effort and should include a discussion of:

 

a)      The major findings: what was learned from the study/project.

b)      How the major findings relate to the existing knowledge base.

c)      The implications of the major findings for Social Work Practice and Policy.

d)      The implications of the major finding for future research (including the limitations of the study and how future research might address these limitations).

 

4) Thesis Defense/Presentation of Findings

 

Upon completion of the capstone project, students will be required to present their findings to the University and to the professional community.  This will include a formal presentation of the work and an opportunity to answer questions.  Additionally, each student will be required to create a poster that highlights the major findings. Students’ posters will be on display during the thesis defense event.

 

Course Schedule

 

The course schedule is designed to work in concert with the timelines established by the University IRB and Graduate Studies.  The first semester timelines are designed to ensure students have sufficient time to submit their work to the University IRB and to receive IRB approval.  The second semester timeline is designed to: a) provide students with a structure to meet the Graduate School guidelines for a “spring” graduation; and b) provide students with a structure to complete the class requirements.  

 

Fall Semester

 

 

Unit 1: PROBLEM FORMULATION

 

Session 1: Overview of course and timelines for assignments. 

 

Session 2: Creating and critiquing research questions.  The role of the literature review in

shaping research questions and describing the problem underpinning the study.

 

Session 3: Strategies for conducting a literature review—process and outcome.

 

Session 4:  In-class critiques of Chapter I.     (Draft of Chapter I due.)

 

Session 5: Protection of Human Subjects—creating informed consent statements/ethical

considerations.

 

 

Unit II: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

 

Session 6: Construction of research methodology: Matching design and sampling plan to

research question(s). Unit of Analysis.

 

Session 7:  In-class critiques of Chapter III.   (Drafts of Chapter III due.)

 

Session 8: Data collection strategies—addressing issues of reliability and validity.

 

Session 9: Establishing realistic timelines for carrying out the study/project.  Issues of

implementation.

 

Unit III: Presenting the Thesis/Project Proposal

 

Session 10: Preparation of IRB packets.

 

Session 11:  In-class critiques of Chapters I and III.

 

Session 12: Formatting issues related to Graduate Projects/Theses—Guest speaker.

 

Session 13: Wrap-up.  Timelines for Spring Semester.  (Chapters I and III and Reading list due.)

 

Spring Semester

 

Unit 1: The Literature Review

 

Session 1: In-class critiques of the Literature Review.

 

Unit 2: Data Analysis

 

Session 2: Review of Decision Tree for Quantitative Analysis.

                        Applying statistical tests to address research questions/test hypotheses.

 

Session 3:  Qualitative Data Analysis Methods—theory behind qualitative analysis.

 

Session 4: Qualitative Data Analysis Continues—strategies for conducting qualitative analysis.

(Final Literature Review Due)

 

Session 5: Strategies for presenting quantitative or qualitative data.

 

Session 6: In-class critiques of Chapter IV. (Drafts of Chapter IV due.)

 

 

Unit 3: Dissemination of Findings

 

Session 7: Strategies for preparing conclusions (Chapter V).

 

 

Session 8: In-class critiques of Chapter V.  (Drafts of Chapter V due.)

 

 

Session 9:  Preparing for public presentation of findings.  Strategies for public presentations.

 

 

Session 10: Preparation for public presentations continued….

 

 

Session 11-13: Thesis/Project Presentations

 

(Chapters IV and V are due no later than the last day of class. This requirement is for the completion of this course.  If the student plans on graduating during the Spring semester, these chapters will need to be completed in accordance with the timeline established by Graduate Studies.) 

 

 


Bibliography

 

Research Methods:  Resources for First Semester

 

 

Ashford, J. B. (1994). Are traditional empirical research methods inherently biased

against people of color? No. In W. Hudson & p. S. Nurius (Eds.), Controversial issues in social work research (pp. 29-34). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

 

Babbie, E. (2001)The Practice of Social Research (9th Edition). Belmont, CA:

Wadsworth.

 

Bloom, M., & Fischer, J. (1982). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable

professional. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

 

Blythe, B. J., & Tripodi, T. (1989). Measurement in direct practice. Newbury Park, CA:

Sage.

 

Bourque, L. B., & Fielder, E. P. (1995). How to conduct self-administered and mail

surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Burford, G., & Hudson, J. (2000). Family group decision making: new directions in

community-centered child and family practice.  New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

            (Final Chapters on Research and Evaluation).

 

Butler, L.S., & Molidor, C.E., (1995). Cultural sensitivity in social work practice and

research with children and families. Early Child Development and Care, 106, 27-33.

 

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental

designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

 

Chavetz, J. (1978). A primer on the construction and testing of theories in sociology.

Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.

 

Cheetham, J. (1992). Evaluating social work effectiveness. Research on Social Work

Practice, 2, 265-287.

 

Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1975). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis

issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

 

Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

 

Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic

inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

 

Eichler, M. (1988). Nonsexist research methods. Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin.

 

Fetterman, D. M. (1989). Ethnography: Step by step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

 

Fink, A. (1995). How to ask survey questions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Fischer, J., & Corcoran, K. (1994). Measures for clinical practice: A sourcebook (2nd ed.,

2 vols.). New York: Free Press.

 

Gambrill, E. (1994). Social work research: priorities and obstacles. Research on Social

Work Practice, 4(3), 359-388.

 

Gilgun, J. F. (1994). A case for case studies in social work research. Social Work, 39,

371-380.

 

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for

qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine de Gruyter.

 

Henderson, D. J., Sampselle, C., Mayes, F., & Oakley, D. (1992). Toward culturally

sensitive research in a multicultural society. Health Care for Women International, 13, 339-350.

 

Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action.

Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.

 

Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

 

Mark, R. (1996). Research made simple. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

 

Mulen, E. J., & Magnabosco, J. L. (1997). Outcome measurement in the human services:

Cross-cutting issues and methods. Washington, DC: NASW Press.

 

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury

Park, CA: Sage.

 

Patton, M. Q., (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park,

CA: Sage

 

Posavac, E. J., & Carey, R. G. (1992). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies

(4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

 

Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University

Press.

 

Reismann, C. K. (Ed.) (1994). Qualitative studies in social work research. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage.

Renzetti, C. M. (1995). Studying partner abuse in lesbian relationships: A case for the

feminist participatory research model. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 3(1), 29-42.

 

Townsend, E., Birch, D. E., Langley, J., & Langille, L. (2000). Participatory research in a                     

mental health clubhouse. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20(1), 19-44.

 

Tutty, L. M., Rothery, M. A., & Grinnell, R. M., Jr. (Eds.) (1996). Qualitative research

for social workers: Phases, steps, and tasks. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

 

Videka_Sherman, L., & Reid, W. J. (Eds.) (1990). Advances in clinical social work

research. Washington, DC: NASW Press.

 

Yeich, S., & Levine, R (1992). Participatory research’s contribution to a

conceptualization of empowerment.  Journal of Applied Social Psychology

(22, 24), pp. 1894-1908.

 

 

Data Analysis: Resources for Second Semester

 

Atkinson, P (1992). Understanding ethnographic texts (Qualitative research methods

series, Vol 25). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

 

Babbie, E., Halley, F., & Zaino, J. (2000). Adventures in social research: data analysis

using SPSS for Windows 95/98. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

 

Ball, M.S., & Smith, G.W.H. (1992). Analyzing visual data (Qualitative research methods

series, Vol 24). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

 

Blalock, H.M., Jr. (1979). Social Statistics (2nd Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

 

Devore, J.L., & Peck, R. (1993). Statistics: The exploration and analysis of data (2nd

Edition). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.

 

Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2000). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont,

California: Wadsworth.

 

Holcomb, Z.C. (1998). Fundamentals of descriptive statistics. Los Angeles: Pyrczak

Publishing.

 

Holcomb, Z.C. (1992). Interpreting basic statistics: a guide and workbook based on

excerpts from journal articles. Los Angeles: Pyrczak Publishing.

 

Kuehl, R.O. (1994). Statistical principles of research design and analysis. Belmont, CA:

Duxbury Press.

 

Mendenhall, W. (1993). Beginning statistics A to Z. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.

 

Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded

sourcebook.  Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Norusis, M.J., (2000). SPSS 10.0 guide to data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ:

Prentice-Hall.

 

Pyrczak, F., & Bruce, R.R., (1992). Writing empirical research reports: a basic guide for

students of the social and behavioral sciences.

 

Ramsey, F. L., Schafer, D. W., (1997). The statistical sleuth: a course in methods of data

analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

 

Rosenthal, J.A. (2001). Statistics and data interpretation for the helping professions.

Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

 

Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting Qualitative Data: methods for analyzing talk, text and

interaction.  Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.